{"id":11468,"date":"2022-10-06T16:59:04","date_gmt":"2022-10-06T13:59:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sydialogue.org\/?p=11468"},"modified":"2023-03-24T17:07:17","modified_gmt":"2023-03-24T14:07:17","slug":"the-future-of-the-nuclear-talks-considering-recent-changes-expected-scenarios-and-possible-effects-on-the-syrian-issue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sydialogue.org\/en\/the-future-of-the-nuclear-talks-considering-recent-changes-expected-scenarios-and-possible-effects-on-the-syrian-issue\/","title":{"rendered":"The Future of the Nuclear Talks Considering Recent Changes\u2026 Expected Scenarios and Possible Effects on the Syrian Issue"},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction:<\/span><\/h2>\n

The 2015 nuclear agreement has given Iran a chance to expand its influence and expand regionally, especially given that the agreement ignores Iran\u2019s regional and global role. Thus, the Iranian political project was freed from many obstacles obstructing its expansionist activities, allowing Iran to expand using its various militias. Indeed, Iran has exploited the lifting of economic sanctions and the unfreezing of its assets in foreign banks to increase its support to its agents and reaffirm its influence and hegemony in the region, which has negatively affected the region, especially in Syria.<\/p>\n

Based on the possibility of the repetition of what was mentioned in any future agreement, this paper aims to look at the possible scenarios with regards to the nuclear talks in Vienna, and the effects of that on Syria. That is due to what\u00a0 negative effects a nuclear agreement -if it happens- can bring to the Syrian issue as was the case in 2015\u2019s agreement, which was described as the second worst agreement made by the American administration with regards to its effects on the Syrian issue, second only to the agreement resulting in handing Assad\u2019s regime\u2019s chemical weapons.<\/p>\n

The paper asks the following questions:<\/p>\n